It's not the results of an election that could determine who is prosecuted. It's the reslts of an election that could -- in a dreamy optimistic fantasy anyway -- determine whether laws are enforced. The Justice Department is right now a branch of a political party, hiring and firing on that basis, and - yes - prosecuting on that basis. Any future president must undo that, and must prosecute openly criminal predecessors, regardless of party. But rather than asking McCain to make that commitment, you choose to ask Obama NOT to. Which side of the law are you on? I repeat: Bush is not a candidate this year. He cannot win or lose. Your acceptance of the idea that party loyalty must supercede all else, including both the rule of law and the significance of elections, that it must go completely unquestioned, just like your fantasies about the utility of torture, is the root of the difficulty here.
Torture Supporter Dershowitz Says Not to Prosecute Bush, Cheney, et alia
Israeli occupation forces carried out multiple invasions, home break‑ins, abductions, and movement restrictions across the occupied...
The UK has settled out of court by paying a “substantial sum” to a Guantánamo Bay...
Mohammed Ibrahim wants to run and play soccer again, but the 14-year-old has had three surgeries...
A Maryland woman has been released and reunited with her family after spending 25 days in...
