Social networking has changed the balance of political power, he said, “but everything we know about technology tells us that the current forms of social network communication, despite their enormous current value for politics, are also intensely dangerous to use. They are too centralized; they are too vulnerable to state retaliation and control.”
In January, investors were said to have put a value of about $50 billion on Facebook, the social network founded by Mark Zuckerberg. If revolutions for freedom rest on the shoulders of Facebook, Mr. Moglen said, the revolutionaries will have to count on individuals who have huge stakes in keeping the powerful happy.
“It is not hard, when everybody is just in one big database controlled by Mr. Zuckerberg, to decapitate a revolution by sending an order to Mr. Zuckerberg that he cannot afford to refuse,” Mr. Moglen said.
By contrast, with tens of thousands of individual encrypted servers, there would be no one place where a repressive government could find out who was publishing or reading “subversive” material.
CBS pulled a "60 Minutes" segment hours before it was set to air on Dec. 21,...
On Thursday evening, as rumors about the Brown University gunman swirled, CNN’s Kaitlan Collins posted on...
The Federal Communications Commission chair, Brendan Carr, admitted at a Senate hearing on Wednesday that there...
Peter Arnett, the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter who spent decades dodging bullets and bombs to bring the...
