There's a Columbia University grad who runs a Tumblr I follow called "The Political Breakdown." I can't remember why I started reading it, but I am glad I did. I am glad because of the post, "Breakdown: The Truth about Drone Strikes."
What I love about it is how perfectly it captures the mindset of apologists for President Obama's drone war. The approach the blog takes is to summarize all the facts about a controversy. The summary on drones is pretty good. The anonymous author cites many of the same excellent sources that I rely upon, has a similar understanding of the facts, and reaches a conclusion that leaves me flabbergasted.
Could I take you through it?
While summarizing the facts, the author neutrally states five things that cast America's drone war in a negative light:
"Much of what we know is pieces from conjecture, comments, anonymous sources, and a good deal of guessing thrown in."
"Though the legality is questionable, it isn't stopping the United States. What's more, there is no congressional oversight to the drone strikes."
The acting U.S. Navy secretary Hung Cao said that the Iranian military severely damaged a major...
Iran said Sunday it struck an unmanned U.S. vessel trying to enter the Strait of...
The U.S. military on Saturday said it struck three Iranian oil tankers after Navy ships were...
