Passage of the US-Iraq security pact under the terms both countries' leaders have advocated could violate the constitutions of both countries, specialists told a congressional subcommittee yesterday.
American constitutional law scholar Oona Hathaway said she believes the Constitution requires Congress to also approve the agreement. The Bush administration has labeled the pact a "status of forces agreement," which can be implemented without congressional approval.
But Hathaway said the US-Iraqi pact is more comprehensive than previous agreements because it allows US troops to engage in military operations and specifies timetables for military withdrawal.
"These are unprecedented in a standard status of forces agreement, have never been part of a standard status of forces agreement, and extend in my view far beyond what the president can do without obtaining congressional approval," said Hathaway, a professor at the University of California at Berkeley's School of Law.
TVNL Comment: So what? Has the Bush administration done ANYTHING that IS Constitutional?
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian released a letter addressed to “the people of the United States of...
NPR has confirmed more than a dozen U.S. service members were wounded and two E-3 Sentry...
Israel’s invasion of southern Lebanon is drawing parallels with its 1982 campaign, and could prove even...
Pope Leo XIV on Sunday rejected claims that God justifies war and prayed especially for Christians...
