TV News LIES

Saturday, Jun 24th

Last update05:20:13 AM GMT

You are here News War At last, the damning evidence that should bury Blair for his lies over Iraq

At last, the damning evidence that should bury Blair for his lies over Iraq

E-mail Print PDF

Many newspapers have so far either ignored or underplayed it, and the BBC has hitherto showed limited interest. And yet the new documents appear to establish more clearly than ever before that Tony Blair misled Parliament and the public about the legality of the war.

In secret evidence to the Chilcot Inquiry, declassified on Monday, Lord Goldsmith stated that Mr Blair based his case for invasion on grounds that ‘did not have any ­application in international law’. Coming from the man who was the Government’s senior law officer, this is an extremely serious charge.

Lord Goldsmith told the inquiry that he felt ‘uncomfortable’ about the way Mr Blair ignored his official legal advice when making his case to Parliament. Asked whether ‘the Prime Minister’s words were compatible with the advice you had given him’, he replied: ‘No.’

A specific incident to which the former Attorney General referred was Mr Blair’s statement to the Commons on January 15, 2003, when he asserted that ‘there are circumstances in which a UN resolution is not necessary, because it is necessary to be able to say, in ­circumstances where an ­unreasonable veto was put down, that we would still act’.

In other words, in his view Britain could legally ignore a veto in the UN Security ­Council by France or Russia, both of which were opposed to an ­invasion, and declare war on Iraq. Yet Lord Goldsmith had advised the Prime Minister the previous day that Britain did not have the legal right to invade Iraq.

Mr Blair repeated the fiction on BBC2’s Newsnight on ­February 6, 2003 that Britain could disregard a UN veto. As when addressing MPs, he was suppressing the advice of the Government’s senior law officer. He also ignored similar legal advice from Elizabeth Wilmshurst, the Deputy Legal Adviser at the Foreign Office, who resigned on the eve of war.

Indeed, it is clear from Lord Goldsmith’s testimony that the Attorney General was ‘no longer actively consulted’ for several months after warning Mr Blair in person on October 22, 2002, that an Anglo-­American invasion of Iraq would be a breach of international law. He was frozen out.

More...


Most Recent Related Stories...


Saudi coalition strikes on Saada market kill dozens

Saudis hit Yemen, kill 25At least 25 Yemeni civilians have been killed by Saudi-led coalition air strike on a market...

US Forces Using White Phosphorus in Populated Areas of Iraq and Syria

US used white phosphorus in SyriaIraq claimed credit for videos earlier this week showing the use of white phosphorus munitions in...

UN: 'Staggering' civilian deaths in Raqqa offensive

Staggering civilian casualties in Raqqa offensiveIntensified coalition air strikes supporting an assault by US-backed rebel forces on Syria’s Raqqa are causing...

3 US troops killed, 2 injured by Afghan soldier

2 soldiers killedThree U.S. soldiers were killed and one other was wounded Saturday in an attack by an...
 
America's # 1 Enemy
Tee Shirt
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
TVNL Tee Shirt
 
TVNL TOTE BAG
Conserve our Planet
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
 
Get your 9/11 & Media
Deception Dollars
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
 
The Loaded Deck
The First & the Best!
The Media & Bush Admin Exposed!