TV News LIES

Thursday, Apr 09th

Last update07:00:18 AM GMT

You are here News Health Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science

Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science

E-mail Print PDF

Dr. John IoannidisMuch of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out wrong. So why are doctors—to a striking extent—still drawing upon misinformation in their everyday practice? Dr. John Ioannidis has spent his career challenging his peers by exposing their bad science.

But beyond the headlines, Ioannidis was shocked at the range and reach of the reversals he was seeing in everyday medical research. “Randomized controlled trials,” which compare how one group responds to a treatment against how an identical group fares without the treatment, had long been considered nearly unshakable evidence, but they, too, ended up being wrong some of the time. “I realized even our gold-standard research had a lot of problems,” he says. Baffled, he started looking for the specific ways in which studies were going wrong. And before long he discovered that the range of errors being committed was astonishing: from what questions researchers posed, to how they set up the studies, to which patients they recruited for the studies, to which measurements they took, to how they analyzed the data, to how they presented their results, to how particular studies came to be published in medical journals.

This array suggested a bigger, underlying dysfunction, and Ioannidis thought he knew what it was. “The studies were biased,” he says. “Sometimes they were overtly biased. Sometimes it was difficult to see the bias, but it was there.” Researchers headed into their studies wanting certain results—and, lo and behold, they were getting them. We think of the scientific process as being objective, rigorous, and even ruthless in separating out what is true from what we merely wish to be true, but in fact it’s easy to manipulate results, even unintentionally or unconsciously. “At every step in the process, there is room to distort results, a way to make a stronger claim or to select what is going to be concluded,” says Ioannidis. “There is an intellectual conflict of interest that pressures researchers to find whatever it is that is most likely to get them funded.”

More,,,


Most Recent Related Stories...


3.1 million bottles of eye drops sold at Walgreens, CVS and more are recalled. Here's what to know.

eye drop recallMore than 3.1 million bottles of eye drops sold at major retailers, including Walgreens and CVS,...

US abortion rate holds steady largely due to travel and telehealth availability – report

Abortion pills ready to be shippedThe abortion rate is holding steady in the US despite total and partial bans in some...

Supreme Court rules for Christian counselor in ‘conversion therapy’ ban case

SC rules against conversian banThe Supreme Court sided with a Christian counselor on Tuesday in her free speech challenge to...

What To Know About BA.3.2, The Highly Mutated COVID Variant Spreading Through The World Right Now

Covid variant 3.2A new COVID-19 variant, BA.3.2, has been detected in 25 states, according to a recent report...
 
America's # 1 Enemy
Tee Shirt
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
TVNL Tee Shirt
 
TVNL TOTE BAG
Conserve our Planet
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
 
Get your 9/11 & Media
Deception Dollars
& Help Support TvNewsLIES.org!
 
The Loaded Deck
The First & the Best!
The Media & Bush Admin Exposed!