Unless you can prove you're being surveilled in a program the government keeps secret, you have no right to sue
In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court on Tuesday threw out a lawsuit challenging the US government’s warrantless surveillance powers on the grounds that the plaintiffs do not have “standing.”
Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Chief Justice John Roberts concluded that the plaintiffs cannot sue the government for the 2008 expansion of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) because they can’t prove the law directly effects them.
The FISA Amendments Act of 2008 authorized broad, warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications, checked only by a secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that doesn’t make it’s activities and procedures available to the public.
A Tennessee school district has banned Roots, the author Alex Haley’s groundbreaking novel and one of...
Jose Espinoza, public information officer with the Laredo Police Department, told USA TODAY that just after...
Murdaugh, a prominent South Carolina attorney whose case garnered national attention, was found guilty in 2023...
A convicted participant in the 6 January 2021 US Capitol attack who was pardoned at the...
