Former special counsel Jack Smith on Thursday staunchly defended his stymied efforts to prosecute President Trump, saying in his first public testimony that he doesn’t regret taking on the failed probes — even as he stares down the threat of prosecution himself.
Over some five hours of questioning before the House Judiciary Committee, Smith remained steadfast that the evidence collected by his team of lawyers showed Trump engaged in criminal activity, both in his efforts to remain in power after the 2020 presidential election and his alleged mishandling of classified documents.
The hearing often grew contentious, as Republican lawmakers portrayed the former Justice Department official’s probes as politically motivated and tensions boiled over from within the public gallery.
And it’s likely not the last time Smith will face the limelight. Here are five takeaways from the hearing.
Hearing an extension of the battle over Trump
Trump is the most polarizing president in modern history, and Thursday’s hearing was a direct reflection of the massive chasm between the parties when it comes to his leadership credentials, particularly related to his actions and rhetoric surrounding Jan. 6, 2021.
Political Glance
Jack Smith, the former U.S. Justice Department Special Counsel who brought two now-dropped criminal cases against President Donald Trump, will publicly testify to the House Judiciary Committee on Jan. 22.
The Justice Department has issued grand jury subpoenas to multiple government officials in Minnesota, including Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, expanding the agency's probe alleging that Minnesota officials conspired to impede law enforcement amid the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.
Lindsey Halligan, a Trump-appointed federal attorney who led the failed prosecutions of two of the president’s political opponents, has left her position at the US justice department, attorney general Pam Bondi said on Tuesday.





























